Biology
Need to change

The wolf population in Italy has grown from around a hundred individuals 50 years ago to more than 3,500, according to recent estimas of ISPRA of 2024.
For many, the species has gone from being a pest to a symbol of a wild and hidden nature, to be respected and loved, perhaps even idolized by someone. For others, who had never encountered the wolf before, it has become the specter of ancient fears, the castle rustler, the bloodthirsty killer of foals and lambs
Perhaps we need to rethink the image of the wolf and give it its proper place as a species among species, without de facto imposing it, but rather building social consensus for its conservation, not for ethical or pasionate reasons, but for its ecological value.
It’s no longer time for extremists from both sides to clash over the wolf’s existence; we need to restore the image of the wolf to its true semblance, without demonizing or idolizing it.
And for this to happen, a species management policy must be implemented that takes into account all categories of people, the “stakeholders” who may be affected by its presence.
From hikers who love hearing the wolf’s cry along the trails, to wildlife experts who consider the wolf a factor in regulating wild ungulate populations, to farmers for their livelihood.
History
From the risk of extinction to the management problem
The history of the wolf in Italy has had an incredible turn
When Operation San Francesco began in the 1970s to recover the species, the Italian wolf populations was truly on the brink of extiction.
For twenty years, it occasionally provided unexpected surprises…the first wolves in Garfagnana, Liguria, the Cuneo Area, and from there to France’s Mercantour region…then a succession of territorial reconquests followed, culminating in its expansion into the Alps, and beyond, with significant expansions year after year.
The story of the wolf’s return has not been accompanied by adequate population management.
The primaty threat to the wolf’s survival is the problem of roaming dogs and anthropogenic hybridization of wolves and dogs, which puts the very genetic heritage of the species at risk. This now raises fears not of the wolf’s physical extinction in Italy, but of its genetic extinction, if the introgression of the canine genome, generation after generation, were to completely replace that of the wolf.
The phenomenon of hybridization is still understudied, and especially the rate of hybridization is insufficiently understood.
Furthemore, as highlilighted by a study Sapienza University of Rome involving dozens of scholars, although everyone agrees that anthropogenic hybridization is a threat to the species, there is still no consensus among experts on how it should be managed; for example, wheter hybrids should be permanently removed from the wild population or sterilizied and then released.
The very definition of a threshold beyond which an individual can be defined as a “hybrid is still a matter of debate.
To avoid a second and inevitable extiction, it os now urgent to define an effective management strategy

Curiosity
In the rest of Europe

